I believe this misses the mark. Our governmental agencies want to dispose of vacant and abandoned houses in their inventory. While I agree with the NACBA in that we should be concentrating on how to keep people in their homes, I think that could be better addressed in a different forum. Whereas, here, the government wants to dump properties into a real estate market that is moving at a snail's pace. I believe the dumping of properties into the market would further depress an already depressed market, further driving down the value of peoples homes.
There again, as stated, I do not disagree with the cleaning of governmental inventories, but perhaps it could be done in such a was as to not further depress the market. One suggestion would be to place the property on the market at 105% of market price, pursuant to an appraisal done within 120 days of placing it on the market. If the property does not sell within a specific number of days, lets say 180 days, then any structures on the property would be removed, and the property would be sold as vacant land for development.
Absurd, I think not. Why place the property for sale above market price? Well, the alternative is to either further depress the market, or create more competition in a market that is already saturated with inventory, or both. And by raising the structures on the property, the undesirable properties would have a chance for new life, to help stimulate the economy, and stop the continued decline of real estate values.
So, by this logic, a desirable property would sell with the possibility of stimulating property values, and if it doesn't sell, a plan is in place to allow breathing room for improvement, and stimulation of real estate values. While I will admit this plan is far from perfect, it is a huge improvement to simply dumping properties into a bad market.
No comments:
Post a Comment